Get FISA Right

We’re going to kick off our social network activism campaign this weekend by targeting one to three Senate Judiciary Committee members.   Who to start with?

If you’d like to discuss why you voted one way or another, please use the comments!  For more on the social network activism campaign, see our latest organizing update.

jon

First order of business: tomorrow’s organizing call is at noon Pacific or 3 p.m. Eastern.  Dialin info and RSVP on Anyvite and Facebook.  Agenda coming soon.

A quick update:

• We’re still planning on launching a Twitter/Facebook campaign over the weekend targeting a few Senators.  Marcy Wheeler and I propose Specter (the only SJC Dem other than Feingold on Twitter), Whitehouse, and Leahy.   By Monday and Tuesday, we can expand and refine our focus.
• A couple candidates for slogans: “Bring JUSTICE to the PATRIOT Act!” (suggested by jsq, I believe), and “Support the JUSTICE Act”
• Apparently our tweeting was noticed, and appreciated, by people in Russ Feingold’s office.  Yay us!
• Nobody else is planning a social network-based campaign to support the JUSTICE Act, and a lot of people are hoping that we can spark something on Twitter and Facebook.
• Once the bill’s reported out of committee, we’ll have a better idea of the timetable for when we should reengage with President Obama — probably with another open letter along with organizing on OFA.

We’re starting to see a lot of press; now’s a great time for a letter to the editor.  If somebody has the time to do a quick press roundup for the blog, that’d be swell — let me know if you need an account.

Please try to check back on the blog late Saturday or Sunday for updates — and we’ll update the email list as well.

We’re off to a good start, with about 345 people in the Facebook group, and 30-40 ready to help on Twitter … which doesn’t sound like a lot until you stop to think that there were less than 300 people in the MyBO group last summer when Mike Stark posed “Will Obama feel the sting of social networks?”.  We have pretty good records of the statistics from the early days, and you can really see the impact of posts from big progressive and technology blogs … so we just have to convince people there’s a story here.

Suggestions?  We’ll do some brainstorming on this in tomorrow’s meeting; for now, if you’ve got ideas, please leave them in the comments.

jon

Great meeting!  Thanks to all the participants, including Michelle from ACLU, Kevin from EFF, Chip from BORDC, Julian from Cato, Cyn from the Momocrats, Jared from EPIC, Korkie, Doug, longtime GFR’ers including Carlo, Manny, Ben, Harry, Joan, Jim, and John — and quite probably others as well; apologies to anybody I missed.  Also apologies for the problems with the chat room.  Grr.  I hate software.

The full chat log is here (with some light editing for readabiility, typo fixing, etc.) and we also have an audio recording.  Here are some of the key takeways:

Read the rest of this entry »

See http://bit.ly/gfrsept24 for details.

We’re likely to have over a dozen people there, so to make it easier for everybody to participate, there’s also a chat room: http://www.chatterous.com/getfisaright/

Rough goals and agenda below … if you’ve got any feedback, please leave it in comments!

jon

We’ll be kicking off a social media activism campaign this weekend — on Twitter, Facebook, Organizing for America, and the blogosphere — to support the JUSTICE Act.  Just which politicians should we target?  What should our “ask” be?

The short-term focus is the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Leahy’s bill is getting marked up in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.  We’ve consistently gotten input at this point that the top priority at this point is to focus on the Democrats, asking them to amend Leahy’s bill to add the reforms from JUSTICE that are not currently in the Leahy bill.

Should we choose a short list of members, and if so who?  For example,  Kohl is a known wild card, Klobuchar and Kaufman have no record on these issues and we don’t know where they’ll go, Leahy and Cardin co-sponsored the more timid reform bill, Specter is facing a tough primary challenge …  How to prioritize? Or do we have the resources to go broad from the beginning?

While less vital, it would also be valuable to ask all Senate Demorcratss, Independents and even centrist Republicans to cosponsor the JUSTICE Act with Feingold, Durbin, et. al.  which will assist in getting support for JUSTICE-y amendments to Leahy.  Do we want to consider this as well?

And then there’s the question of what we’re asking for — at a high level, and the details.  One possible slogan is “Support the JUSTICE Act”.  Other thoughts?

As for the details, here are several specific provisions we want Senators to lift from the JUSTICE bill:

• heightening the standard for and limiting the scope of NSLs,
• reforming the John Doe roving wiretaps provision
• allowing the “lone wolf” wiretapping provision to expire.
• JUSTICE’s amendments to the FISA Amendments Act, especially the amendments 1) prohibiting bulk collection of international communications, 2) strengthening the requirements for government “minimization” of the communications it collects, and 3) repealing the telecom immunity provision.

How to frame this succinctly?

Suggestions welcome!  We’ll also be discussing this on tonight’s conference call — see http://get-fisa-right.wetpaint.com/page/September+24+Organizing+call for details.

jon

By: Harry Waisbren

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing “Reathorizing the USA PATRIOT Act: Ensuring Liberty and Security” is scheduled to begin at 7:00 am PST. I’ll be watching the webcast and doing some more live-tweeting from @GetFISARight, and if you’re so inclined come say hi or just comment on what you think about the #PatriotAct!

Update: The hearing just finished, and you can check here on the wiki for a log of the #patriotact tweets.

By: Harry Waisbren

I live-tweeted on @GetFISARight during Tuesday’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties hearing on the USA PATRIOT Act.

The tweets are saved here on our wiki, and I’ll be back at it tomorrow for the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing “Reathorizing the USA PATRIOT Act: Ensuring Liberty and Security”. Definitely say hi if you’re watching or paying attention to the feed (and if you do, we’re focusing our attention on the #patriotact tag).

There is a lot going on very quickly, so if you come by a relevant article/blog post it’d be a big help if you can relay the link to us in the comments or to @GetFISARight. We could use these links for our news roundup posts especially, which we’ll be making for these hearings and more as we progress.

By: Harry Waisbren

The ACLU has come out with a campaign to Tell Your Senators You Want Patriot Act Reform. Their rhetoric is aggressive, including their descriptions of “The Bush administration’s calculated assault on our civil liberties and privacy rights”, the creation of a “surveillance superstructure”, and the need to investigate the abuses in its call for sweeping reform.

It calls for us to—

Please contact your Senators and your Representative right now and tell them it is time to re-examine our security superstructure to restore our civil liberties.

The link leads to an email petition that promotes our “opportunity to bring the Patriot Act in line with the Constitution”. This opportunity, however, requires that we “make sure the Senate Judiciary Committee supports the Feingold JUSTICE Act.”

They argue that in order to adequately reform the Patriot Act, “at the very least”, Congress must make these four critical reforms:

• Limit electronic surveillance laws such as the Patriot Act and the FISA Amendments Act so that they are targeted only at suspected terrorists and spies and so that personal information about innocent Americans is no longer swept into government programs and databases.
• Amend the criminal material support statute expanded by the Patriot Act so that it criminalizes only behavior intended to further terrorist activity, not good faith charitable activities of Americans.
• Amend the ideological exclusion provisions of immigration law expanded by the Patriot Act so that foreign scholars, experts and advocates are not denied visas solely on the basis of their beliefs.
• Prevent federal agents from spying on individuals and infiltrating organizations based solely on their exercise of First Amendment rights such as religious practice or political protest activities, as permitted under recently revised Attorney General Guidelines.

There’s absolutely no doubt that people will be screaming about how this sort of reform will be to blame for an upcoming sequel to 9/11, which is precisely why I’m such a fan of the ACLU’s aggressive, blunt attitude here. While writing this post I thought about how refreshing it is to hear from civil liberties stallwarts who do not kowtow to “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security” as Ben Franklin described them in his day.

Anyways, good for the ACLU, and when you have a minute, send an email and help their push for Patriot Act reform!

To help prepare for a weekend social media activism campaign, we’ve scheduled a couple of organizing phone calls:

• Thursday, September 24, 5 p.m. Pacific/8 p.m. Eastern
• Saturday, September 26, noon Pacific/8 p.m. Eastern

The goals for Thursday’s meeting include introducing people to each other, a shared understanding of strategy, identifying key deliverables and working, and establishing a media outreach plan.  On Saturday, we’ll finalize our collateral (instructions for Twitter and Facebook, sample emails, and more details for bloggers), officially launch, see where we are on the media front, and figure out what next.

It should be exciting … stay tuned!

Here’s the Anyvite invitation with the details on Thursday … or if you’re on Facebook, here’s the event.

jon

By: Harry Waisbren

I’m happy to report that we are moving forward on our media strategy, the need for which I described yesterday. Jon took action and started a Justice Act Media List on the wiki, and I have been preparing initial outreach via Twitter in particular using TPM’s Twitter Rooms.

I will have more to say about Twitter soon, but I want to emphasize a comment I made to Jon’s wiki page about utilizing our members’ media capacity to the fullest. The importance of this was further described in my Targetting the Media Post:

Fortunately, the constituency of our community remains chock full of new media entrepreneurs—some of whom are amongst the most adept in the world of leveraging new technologies to break past older filters that close down democratic discourse.

Our community includes media mavens participating in various capacities such as Ari Melber, Marcy Wheeler, Mike Stark, Jon Pincus, Tracy Viselli and many, many more. If we are able to hone the capacity of our bi-partisan media community to amplify our message through various mediums (blogs, social networks, web-video, print, etc) I have absolutely no doubt that it would rival any other kind of coverage we could hope to get—in fact, it would act to spur much wider mainstream media coverage as is.