“The fate of legislation to revive the government’s warrantless spying powers remains murky after President Trump last week called for a Senate Intelligence Committee nomination hearing for Jay Clayton, his pick to serve as director of national intelligence, to be postponed.”
Despite surveillance hawks wringing their hands about how the FISA lapse that started on June 12 could cause the sky to fall, the Administration sure doesn’t seem to see it as urgent. Not only is acting director of national Intelligence Bill Pulte starting mass firing at ODNI reinforcing Democrats’ refusal to do any reauthorization until a permanent DNI is in place, Trump’s is now saying that he’ll veto any version of FISA that doesn’t include SAVE Act — a voter-suppression bill has no chance of passing the Senate on its own, so apparently dooms FISA until he backs down.
It’s hard to know when things will start up again. Trump has a meeting with Senate Republicans on Wednesday, so maybe after that? The House is scheduled to be in session from June 23 to July 3, and June 26 is the Senate’s last scheduled day before the holiday … will there even be a vote before then? Time will tell.
After that, there’s still a long ways to go. Both chambers come back on July 13 (although the House will only be there for a couple of weeks before the August recess), and they’re in session for a few weeks in September as well, but the closer it gets to an election the less likely it is that they’ll tackle something so controversial. Existing certifications go through March 2027, so they can also take a crack at it in the post-election “lame duck” sessions in November and December or early next Congress. It’s exhausting just writing this …
In any case, once things do pick up, they’re likely to start moving quickly. So … stay tuned!
If you want more frequent updates than we have here on the blog … well, Get FISA Right has always been adventurous on social networks, so we’ve set up a couple of feeds in the Atmosphere.
FISA (uncurated) has a broad selection of posts related to FISA and Section 702
FISA (curated) has posts related to FISA and Section 702 from a list of about 50 organizations, legal experts, journalists, and activists focused on surveillance, human rights, and civil rights
You don’t need accounts to check the feeds. That said, if you’ve bot a Blacksky, Bluesky, or Eurosky account you can pin them to make it easier to see regular updates — and you can also follow us, at @getfisaright.net.
The final vote on H.R.9238, a three-week extension of FISA Section 702
Both chambers of Congress have left town, meaning that FISA Section 702 won’t be reauthorized by the June 12 “deadline”. Even though the lapse is likely to be temporary, it’s still a big deal. This is the first time these authorities have lapsed since they were put in place in 2008 — the year Get FISA Right started. So thanks to all the legislators in both parties who voted “no” … and thanks to all the activists who have gotten involved over the years!
Still, a lapse really is a big victory for reformers. Intelligence agencies and surveillance hawks hate hate hate the idea of reforms, and two years ago they were able to get a reauthorization without conceding. That didn’t work this time.
And it’s really worth highlighting the bipartisan pus for reforms. 9 House Republicans voting against the reauthorization, and Senate Republicans including Mike Lee and Rand Paul also said that a reauthorization without reforms was a non-starter. While Trump’s appointment of the odious Bill Pulte was a key reason that Democratic leaders finally rallied against reauthorization, the statement from House Democratic leadership also highlighted that the path to reauthoriation “will require enacting meaningful reforms”
“Senators from both sides of the aisle have introduced bills that would reauthorize Section 702 while making crucial reforms: The Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2026 (GSRA); the Security and Freedom Enhancement Act of 2026 (SAFE Act); and the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act of 2026 (Protect Liberty Act).”
All of these include reforms like a warrant requirement and closing the data broker loophole, which have broad public support as well as bipartisan support in Congress.
What next? The House is on recess until June 23, but they might well take FISA up again once they get back. Or, the Senate might decide to take another crack at it. Not long after the vote, Trump announced that he was nominating Jay Clayton (US Attorney in Manhatten, and former chair of SEC) as permanent Director of National Intelligence. Even though Clayton is statutorially unqualified for the role (since he doesn’t have any intelligence experience), he’s not Pulte, so surveillance hawks are probably hoping that will be enough to change the dynamics. So we shall see …
Right now, though, it’s a good time to thank your Representatives if they voted “nay” today — or let them know you’re disappointed if they voted “yea.”. Here’s the roll-call vote.
The US Capitol switchboard at 202-224-312 is a good option if you want to hone — or just call their DC or local office directly.
Your message doesn’t have to be fancy! Here are sample scripts.
If your representative voted “no”, thank them!
I’m [NAME], and I’m a constituent from [CITY]. I want to thank [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] for voting against the three-week extension to FISA Section 702. This is our best chance yet to reform FISA, and there’s broad bipartisan support for a warrant requirement and closing the data broker loophole. When the House takes up this issue again, please continue to vote against any reauthorization that does not include these reforms
If your representative voted “yes”and is a Republican, let them know you’re disappointed!
I’m [NAME], and I’m a constituent from [CITY]. I I was very disappointed that [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] voted for a reauthorization of FISA Section 702 without any reforms on June 11. Reforms like a warrant requirement and closing the data broker loophole have broad bipartisan support; 19 Republicans voted against this extnesion, and I was really hoping [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] would be one of them.
When the House takes up this issue again, please against any reauthorization unless it includes these reforms. Now more than ever in the era of mass AI, personal privacy and civil liberties must be protected.
If your representative voted “yes”and is a Democrat, let them know you’re disappointed and highlight the threat of the Trump administration!
I’m [NAME], and I’m a constituent from [CITY]. I I was very disappointed that [REPRESENTATIVE NAME] voted for a reauthorization of FISA Section 702 without any reforms on June 11. The Trump administration has shown they can’t be trusted, and their nominee for Director of National Intelligence is unqualified. Reforms like a warrant requirement and closing the data broker loophole have broad bipartisan support.
When the House takes up this issue again, please against any reauthorization unless it includes these reforms. Now more than ever in the era of mass AI, personal privacy and civil liberties must be protected.
“The House will vote Thursday on a three-week extension of a key surveillance program a day ahead of its expiration, Speaker Mike Johnson said Wednesday.
But leaders of both parties expect the measure to fail, risking a first-ever lapse of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act as the House prepares to leave for recess until June 23.”
Whoa baby. Things always get wacky as we get close to the FISA deadline, and this year is no exception. Democratic leadership in both chambers have consistentlysaid that Trump’s plan to install Bill Pulte as Acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) is a dealbreaker on FISA. On Tuesday afternoon Speaker Johnson went to the White House to meet with Trump, after which Trump … moved up Pulte’s starting date?!?!?!
Unsurprisingly, that didn’t change any minds. So on Wednesday morning, Trump asked for a short-term extension to give time to nominate somebody for the permanent DNI position — while also directing Pulte to downsize the agency. Hmm.
Sen. Wyden attempted to break the deadlock with two proposals, including one for a five-week extension with just some transparency requirements. Because of the short timeframe, though, the only way to get these through the Senate would be by unanimous consent … and Sen. Conryn said no. After that, Speaker Johnson scheduled a vote for Thursday on a three-week extension. Because it’s going directly to the floor (he doesn’t have enough Republican votes to get it through Rules), it will need a two-thirds majority to pass, and as long as nothing happens on the Pulte front that’s very unlikely. Even if it somehow passes the House, it would still have to get through the Senate … which is also very unlikely.
Since the deadline for FISA Section 702 reauthorization is Friday, June 12, Republicans claim that not passing an extension will cause the sky to fall. That’s nonsense; as the Brennan Center for Justice discusses in detail, Section 702 Surveillance Will Continue Until March 2027 Even if the Statute Lapses. Whether or not they pass a short-term extension, they can take another try at it once Trump names a DNI, or when the DNI is confirmed and Pulte is gone, or in the lame-duck session, or early next year with a new Congress. So on the one hand, whatever.
Looking at it differently, though, a lapse would be a big win reformers. Intelligence agencies and surveillance hawks hate hate hate the idea of reforms, but warrant requirement and closing the data broker loophole both have bipartisan support in Congress — and are overwhelmingly popular with the public. A lapse increases the chance that reformers will be able to force a vote.
But, never say never. There’s still plenty of time for a surprise, either this week or when Congress comes back after a short recess. Stay tuned!
And, if you get a chance, call your representatives. You can use the US Capitol switchboard at 202-224-312, call your legislators office directly. or use calling tools from Indivisible and QuitGPT. Here’s a short script:
Hi, my name is [Your Name], and I’m a constituent from [Your City, State]. I am calling today to ask that reject any extension to FISA Section 702 unless it includes key bipartisan reforms: requiring a warrant and closing the data broker loophole. Please do not be fooled by fake reforms that simply restate existing law, and please stop passing short-term extensions that just kick the ball down the road.
“The battle over FISA 702 reauthorization continues. A bipartisan coalition of reformers continue to press to introduce a warrant requirement and close the data broker loophole. Surveillance hawks continue to press for reauthorization without any meaningful reforms. In April, 42 Democrats joined the majority of House Republicans in passed a three-year authorization without meaningful reforms — boooooo!!!!! Fortunately the Senate said no, and so at the last moment they passed a 45-day extension. With only ten days left, time’s running out to come to agreement — or let the statute lapse. “
“Senate Republicans early Friday could not muster enough votes to move forward on a long-term reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, leaving the key surveillance power, which expires next week, in limbo as both chambers leave the Capitol for the weekend.”
“I’ll be fighting like hell between now and June 12 to ensure Congress doesn’t cave and renew Section 702 of FISA without real reforms. Security and liberty aren’t mutually exclusive, and it seems like Congress is finally starting to understand that.”
Once again FISA reauthorization is going down to the wire. Early last week there were reports that Sen. John Warner had convinced enough Senate Democrats to support a “compromise” (ha-ha) three-year extension without any real reforms, hoping that enough Democrats would also cross over in the House to pass it. But once Bill Pulte — with no intelligence experience and a track record of abusing data to target the President’s opponents — was installed as Acting Director of National Intelligence and nominated for the permanent role — Democrats in both chambers drew the line. And time is running out to get agreement by the June 12 “deadline”. What a mess.
It’s worth highlighting that the “deadline” isn’t real. Even if Section 702 doesn’t get reauthorized by June 12, the surveillance continues for another nine months: the FISA Court has already approved the certifications through March 2027. So Congress could re-authorize it during the lame duck session in December, or early next year. Still, surveillance hawks are still trying to use the fake “deadline” to create a sense of urgency.
In Punchbowl News, Jake Sherman et al suggest that “short of removing Pulte from the job, the only other way to assuage Democrats would be for Trump to name a permanent nominee who meets the qualifications outlined in the statute that created ODNI.” Very honestly, if it were any other adminstration I’d be assuming that was the game plan, and the cynic in me would be wondering whether the whole Pulte subplot was a ploy to let Democrats claim to win something and then get behind the previous “compromise” (ha-ha) deal. With this administration … who knows. But, it’s still a possibility to be nervous about.
Still, even if the Pulte mess somehow gets cleared up, there’s no guarantee that anything without significant reforms will be able to pass the House. Politico reports that House Freedom Caucus Republicans are restarting their social media campaign to demand a warrant requirement, so it might be challenging to get something through Rules. If that doesn’t happen, Speaker Johnson’s only option is a floor vote without a rule which would require a 2/3 majority — and with a majority of House Democrats also supporting reforms, it’s not clear how likely that is. Over the weekend Senators Tom Cotton and Chuck Grassley sent to Secretary of State Marco Rubio warning that Section 702 authorities might lapse, and urging the administration to “explore alternative legal authorities to continue collecting intelligence and, if necessary, to draft an executive order to address the gap left by the expiration of the law.” Rubio wrote back saying how bad that would be. It’s shameless posturing — the “deadline” isn’t real — but it’s worked in the past.
Of course they could pass something with real reforms. Proposed reform legislation including the GSRA, SAFE Act and Protect Liberty Act has bipartisan support, and the votes are probably there in both chambers. But I’m not holding my breath. Maybe they can find the votes for another short-term extension, but then again everybody in both parties is pretty sick of this nonsense so maybe not. The closer we get to midterm elections, the less time and energy Congress wants to spend on a polarizing issue like FISA. So we shall see.
In any case, it’s once again a great time to contact your legislators! This is a situation where calls are likely to have a lot more impact than emails; you can use the US Capitol switchboard at 202-224-312, call your legislators office directly. or use calling tools from Indivisible and QuitGPT if you prefer. Both the House and Senate will be voting, so if you have time please call your Senators as well as your Representative!
Here’s a simple script.
Hi, my name is [Your Name], and I’m a constituent from [Your City, State]. I am calling today to ask that reject any extension to FISA Section 702 unless it includes key bipartisan reforms: closing requiring a warrant and closing the data broker loophole. Please do not be fooled by fake reforms that simply restate existing law, and please stop passing short-term extensions that just kick the ball down the road. Instead, support real reform like the GSRA — which has bipartisan support in both chambers.
The battle over FISA 702 reauthorization continues. A bipartisan coalition of reformers continue to press to introduce a warrant requirement and close the data broker loophole. Surveillance hawks continue to press for reauthorization without any meaningful reforms. In April, 42 Democrats joined the majority of House Republicans in passed a three-year authorization without meaningful reforms — boooooo!!!!! Fortunately the Senate said no, and so at the last moment they passed a 45-day extension. With only ten days left, time’s running out to come to agreement — or let the statute lapse.
It’s important to realize that the June 12 “deadline” is fake: FISA certifications have already been renewed until March 2027 even if Congress doesn’t act. But the closer we get to midterm elections, the less time and energy Congress wants to spend on a polarizing issue like FISA. So reformers have a lot of leverage now, and proposed reform legislation including the GSRA, SAFE Act and Protect Liberty Act has bipartisans support. But there’s also a lot of pressure on Congress to pass something.
Which means that s a great time to contact your legislators! This is a situation where calls are likely to have a lot more impact than emails; you can use the US Capitol switchboard at 202-224-312, call your legislators office directly. or use calling tools from Indivisible and QuitGPT if you prefer. Both the House and Senate will be voting, so please call your Representative as well as your Senator.
Here’s a simple script.
Hi, my name is [Your Name], and I’m a constituent from [Your City, State]. I am calling today to ask that reject any extension to FISA Section 702 unless it includes key bipartisan reforms: closing requiring a warrant and closing the data broker loophole. Please do not be fooled by fake reforms that simply restate existing law, and please stop passing short-term extensions that delay real reform. Instead, support real reform like the GSRA — which has bipartisan support in both chambers.
The battle over FISA 702 reauthorization continues. Last Thursday, Speaker Johnson tried to sneak through a horrible “compromise” proposal (a five-year extension with a fake warrant requirement in exchange for broadening FISA use in criminal cases) with almost no notice — less than two hours from when the amended version was published until the vote. Fortunately, it backfired big time; a dozen Republicans opposed it, and only a handful of surveillance-friendly Democrats wanted to give more power to the Trump administration. After a vote on an 18-month clean reauth also failed, Congress bought themselves a little more time by passing a ten-day extension.
After that big win for reformers, the Senate is working on its own proposal “for a three-year extension … with policy changes” to pass it with a 2/3 majority. But what policy changes do they have in mind? Surveillance hawks presumably want more fake safeguards and broadened powers. Reformers are focused on closing the backdoor search loophole, closing the data broker loophole, introducing a real warrant requirement, and other improvements.
UPDATE, April 22: Meanwhile, Speaker Johnson is giving it another try in the House, trying to get ahead of the Senate. The politics are very messy, and it’s not at all clear what if anything will break the impasse.
Of course, the April 30 “deadline” is fake: FISA certifications have already been renewed until March 2027 even if Congress doesn’t act. But the closer we get to midterm elections, the less time and energy Congress wants to spend on a polarizing issue like FISA. So reformers have a great opportunity to build on last week’s win …
Which means this is a great time to contact your legislators! This is a situation where calls are likely to have a lot more impact than emails; you can use the US Capitol switchboard at 202-224-312, call your legislators office directly. or use calling tools from Indivisible and QuitGPT if you prefer.
Whichever option you choose, here’s a script (based on Indivisible’s).
Hi, my name is [Your Name], and I’m a constituent from [Your City, State]. I am calling today to ask that [Senator Name] demand major reforms to Section 702 of the FISA, and to withhold your vote from reauthorization without reforms.
Specifically, it is essential that you withhold your vote from reauthorization until the legislation is amended to:
Close the Backdoor Search Loophole
Close the Data Broker Loophole
And please do not be fooled by fake reforms! Now more than ever in the era of mass AI, personal privacy and civil liberties must be protected.
It’s that time again! Some FISA Section 702 warrantless wiretapping powers will sunset unless they’re renewed by April 20, so Congress has to do something. The 2024 battle ended up badly for reformers; the two-year reauthorization in the Reforming (Ha-Ha) Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA) mostly preserving the status quo and actually expanding surveillance powers. This time, there are multiple reform proposals on the table, although surveillance hawks in both parties are pushing to allow the Trump administration to keep its powers via a “clean” reauthorization.
The GSRA (Government Surveillance Reform Act), sponsored by Senators Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Representatives Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) and Zoe Lofgren (D-California), is the only bipartisan bicameral reform bill. Sen. Wyden’s website lists the following reforms:
Closing the backdoor search loophole: The bill requires the federal government to get a warrant to access Americans’ private communications gathered under Section 702, with important exceptions for emergency situations.
Closing the data broker loophole: The bill bans the federal government from buying Americans’ data from data brokers without a warrant.
Prohibiting reverse targeting: The bill prohibits using surveillance on foreigners overseas through Section 702 as a pretext for gathering data on Americans.
Repealing the “make everyone a spy” provision: This bill repeals a controversial 2024 expansion that allows the government to force millions of Americans and companies to secretly spy on its behalf.
Reforming intelligence collection outside FISA: This bill protects Americans from intelligence agencies using non-statutory authorities, including by prohibiting backdoor searches and reverse targeting outside of FISA.
Updating privacy protections for AI and other modern technologies: This bill requires federal law enforcement to get a warrant to surveil Americans’ location information, web browsing data, search and chatbot records, and car onboard and telematics data.
Halting warrantless collection of business records: This bill protects Americans’ data from warrantless collection under an authority that expired over five years ago.
Enhancing oversight and accountability: The bill strengthens judicial oversight, public reporting, and accountability requirements under FISA.
A wide range of civil rights and digital rights groups endorse the GSRA, including ACLU, Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC), Brennan Center for Justice, CDT, Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Fight for the Future, Muslim Advocates, estore the Fourth, and Free Press Action. A section-by-section summary of the bill is here. The full bill text is here.
There are also two other reform bills that don’t go quite as far as GSRA, but also have wide support from civil liberties organizations:
The SAFE act, sponsored by Senator Lee along with Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) is another reform bill, although as EFF notes its reforms fall short in some ways. .
PLEWSA (the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act ), from Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Arizona), also includes significant reforms, and may appeal more to Freedom Caucus members in the House.
We received notice from Restore the Fourth about a comment period on a DHS change to the agency’s record system. Disturbingly, they have already made the change, but now are asking for retroactive approval. Sorry, no approval from us!
There are just 3 days left to comment, so have your say at this link.
Here is the text of Restore the Fourth’s e-mail announcing the comment period, which I sadly did not notice days ago when it was sent:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), for the first time, has begun pooling data from DHS, the Social Security Administration, the IRS and state voter rolls, to generate a list of US citizens in its “Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE)” database.
They have begun doing this without notifying the American public of this change in practice, and without offering an opportunity before they began for people to comment, violating the National Privacy Act of 1974. That Act, responding to Watergate, intentionally siloed federal datasets, preventing different federal agencies from sharing data except in very specific cases where justification and notification of the subject of the “investigation” is required.
Without that siloing, the government can go fishing across all of government to find anything that a pre-selected person has done wrong; and doing that violates the Fourth Amendment.
What USCIS is doing now is asking for public comment on these changes that have already happened, in order to get some sort of retrospective blessing and insulate themselves from legal challenges. We don’t bless it. We urge you to write comments objecting to it.
Below is the Restore the Fourth suggested e-mail with a list of talking points; use one or more, paraphrase, or write your own comment:
I oppose the change that DHS/USCIS has implemented to the US Citizenship and Immigration Service’s (USCIS’) Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database. Pooling data from DHS, the Social Security Administration, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and state voter data and other sources violates the National Data Privacy Act of 1974. The fact that DHS/USCIS is belatedly asking for comment about the changes that it has already implemented by accessing data from other federal agency databases in order to gather additional information on immigrants in violation of the National Data Privacy Act is deeply troubling because many Americans would have opposed this change had they been consulted ahead of the change, as the Act requires.
The National Privacy Act of 1974 created silos in order to prevent different federal agencies from sharing data except in very specific cases, and in those cases justification and notification of the subject of the “investigation” is required. Enacted in the aftermath of Watergate, the National Privacy Act was designed to protect Americans from investigations where the government is fishing for evidence that someone has committed a crime with no predicate based on probable cause that they have done anything criminal. Access by any agency to another agency’s data without probable cause to see specific data on a suspect is illegal in order to protect all of us, regardless of our political party or our immigration status. Every resident of the U.S. is entitled to the protections enshrined by the Fourth Amendment of our Constitution.
The legal justification provided by DHS in its SORN for its merger of federal databases is a 1999 opinion in which the Department of Justice limited the kinds of restrictions agencies could put on sharing data with law enforcement. It provides for the lawful disclosure of citizenship- or immigration-related information, but it does not grant the Social Security Administration the authority to disclose information without adhering to the requirements of the Privacy Act.
The repurposing of data from different agencies is also dangerous because different people’s records may be incorrectly linked together because of a name misspelling or even a failure to update a name change.
DHS/ICIS has implemented additional changes to normal practices as part of its consolidation. Until recently there was no way to deactivate a person’s Social Security number and prevent them from receiving benefits unless there was documentation of their death. Under SAVE, DHS now uses a special indicator code to flag what it considers questionable data or special circumstances concerning an application for an SSN. This allows DHS, without any form of review, to terminate someone’s Social Security benefit. In one case earlier this year when the Social Security Administration under DOGE accidentally declared an 82-year-old man dead (see https://www.livenowfox.com/news/seattle-man-social-security-error), he lost his Social Security benefits, Medicare coverage, and even access to his bank fund. Since in the system being implemented by DHS there will be challenges in matching up names across various databases, the risk of accidental terminations of benefits is heightened.
In 2023, a lawyer from the Social Security Administration wrote to the Fair Elections Center that “while SSA records provide an indication of citizenship, they do not provide definitive information on U.S. citizenship,” so it is very concerning that SSA data can now be used to eliminate Americans from voter rolls without further verification.
Until now, undocumented Immigrants who lawfully paid federal taxes on their earnings using an Individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN) were promised that their personal information would remain confidential. DHS access to the IRS database completely undermines this protection, making it much less likely that they will file. This reduces government revenue and will result in increased taxes for the rest of us.
Senate may vote Friday on expansion of FISA Section 702 warrantless surveillance – and maybe also a warrant requirement
FISA Section 702 expires Friday unless it’s reauthorized. This “deadline” doesn’t really matter in terms of national security: the FISA Court has already approved extending existing certifications for another year. But, intelligence agencies and surveillance hawks are trying to use it to strongarm the Senate into passing an expansion of warrantless surveillance that’s so big that Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and civil liberties groups describe as “terrifying.”
Even supporters of the “Everybody Is a Spy bill” like Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) admit this huge expansion is poorly drafted, but he — like the intelligence agencies, and leadership in both parties — thinks the Senate should pass it anyhow. Others disagree including Sen. Cramer (R-ND):
“We can’t have a timeline put to your head like a gun and say, ‘pass a mediocre bill because you’ve got to do it quickly,’ especially given the fact that it’s already sought and received from the court itself a one-year reprieve.”
Then again, there are also two amendments with strong support: one from Sen. Wyden to roll back the terrifying poorly-drafted expansion the House passed, and another from Sen. Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Cramer to introduce a warrant requirement that’s somewhat narrower than the warrant requirement that almost passed the House last week. Andrew Desiderio of Punchbowl News reported this afternoon that leadership wants to get it wrapped up by tomorrow, but are concerned is that some these amendments could actually pass — and if it seems like that might happen, they’d rather run out the clock than risk a vote.
So we’ll see what happens. If the Senate doesn’t vote Friday, it’s possible that they’ll vote Saturday or next week. If they do vote Friday and pass an amendment, then it goes back to the House, who might try to squeeze in a vote on Friday night but given how dysfunctional things are that might also be challenging.
If you haven’t already contacted your Senators, now’s a great time! If you have, please consider following up with them. You can either use EFF’s form, call the Congressional switchboard at (202) 224-3121 or use the Senate directory to look up your legislators’ contact info. Here’s a short script:
“Please OPPOSE the terrifying, poorly-drafted Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA), H.R.7888, which would dramatically expand the government’s warrantless surveillance powers. Instead, REMOVE the expansino of FISA 702 powers the House added, and SUPPORT a warrant requirement. Don’t be fooled by the apparent April 19 “deadline”; the FISA Court has already approved a one-year renewal.”
Senator Ron Wyden says RISAA “represents one of the most dramatic and terrifying expansions of government surveillance authority in history.” One especially big problem with this House bill is what privacy organizations call the “Everyone Is A Spy” provision, which gives the government unchecked authority to order millions of Americans to spy on behalf of the government – which would also help Trump crack down on the media
Wyden and Senator Mike Lee are leading a bipartisan coalition of privacy advocates trying to stop the Senate from passing the House bill — see the end of the article for a video of Sen. Wyden’s powerful speech. So now’s a great time to contact the Senate. You can either use EFF’s form, call the Congressional switchboard at (202) 224-3121 or use the Senate directory to look up your legislators’ contact info. Here’s a short script:
“Please OPPOSE the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA), H.R.7888, which would dramatically expand the government’s warrantless surveillance powers – and any other FISA Section 702 reauthorization including the “Everyone Is A Spy” provision that gives the government unchecked authority to order millions of Americans to spy on behalf of the government.”
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
Posted by jdp23 
