Discussing IAC Letter

October 11, 2010

Let’s use this thread for final discussion over whether or not our group should sign on to the International Action Center’s letter to Stop FBI Repression of Anti-War Activists NOW: Condemn the FBI Raids and Harassment of Anti-War and International Solidarity Activists.

We first introduced potentially endorsing the letter in our last update post, and now we can move to look at the pro/con arguments made before finalizing whether we sign or not with a vote.


Second Feingold-Johnson debate tonight

October 11, 2010

The second Feingold-Johnson Wisconsin Senate debate will be tonight at 7pm.  Once a rewindable, archived version is available, I’ll try to transcribe the relevant parts of the debate for us at “Get FISA Right” as quickly as possible.

To follow along online , go to one of these media sites: Wsaw.com, Wisconsin Public Radio, WAOW Newsline 9 , or the Wausau Daily Herald.  Be ready to twitter about it using the hashtag #feingolddem, and/or #gfr4russ!   You can get rapid responses to Johnson’s claims by text message; to get the Feingold team’s rapid responses, go here to provide them with your phone number, or text FACT to 91990.

===

Meanwhile, consider signing up for the Democracy for America/Progressive Congressional Campaign Committee’s “Call Out the Vote” program, on behalf of Feingold and selected other candidates:

  • All you need to participate is a phone, a computer with an Internet connection, and a quiet place to make calls
  • Phonebanking shifts are two hours long — we ask you stay on for the entire two hours
  • After you sign up, you’ll get a call from us welcoming you to the program and training you on our system
  • There will be a 10 minute training call before your shift to go over the script and answer questions

I haven’t tried “Call out the Vote” yet, to be honest, so I don’t know yet whether one can specify which candidate one would like to make phone calls for.  Meanwhile, I’ve contacted the Feingold campaign to see if they have a similar setup.

Finally, don’t forget: support Russ Feingold now!


Feingold bests Johnson in first debate

October 10, 2010

Russ Feingold faced Ron Johnson in a televised debate Friday night –and took advantage of it. I transcribed some of their exchanges and have posted them online. Some highlights (or lowlights in Johnson’s case):

  • Responding to a question about the Tea Party, Johnson claimed “Senator Feingold’s record has been pretty clear: he wants government control over lives, he wanted a single payer government run health care system, he has voted for higher taxes…” That gave Russ Feingold the chance to respond:

    I’ve been waiting for a chance to talk to the Tea Party people about where we agree and where Mr. Johnson disagrees. The people in the Tea Party really value the Constitution. I think they probably read the Constitution before they were 55 years old which Mr. Johnson admitted, he just read it this year. And even though he made some comments originally about how the PATRIOT Act maybe had some problems he fell into line with the Republican view and he says he’s for the PATRIOT Act. I was the only Senator to vote against the PATRIOT Act because it invaded personal freedom, and the Tea Party people agree with me on that.

  • Johnson’s concern for freedom seemed to only extend as far as his wallet. Freedom of speech? Not so much:

    I’m also somewhat optimistic from the standpoint that we have General David Petraeus, I think probably the finest general we have operating the Army today. And by the way it’s, you know, a general that Senator Feingold refused to vote for the resolution condemning Moveon.org that placed the ad in the New York Times calling it General “Betray Us.” I thought that was pretty shameful.

  • On checks, balances, and separation of powers, Johnson tried to deny that he would simply duck all debate once a war was on. But his explanation of what he would do instead sounded like he didn’t understand members of Congress have actual powers they’re supposed to wield:

    I wouldn’t do what Senator Feingold did, is try and float a resolution to cut off funding while our troops are in battle in Iraq. If I had a real problem with the war, what I would do is I would talk with my fellow Congress people, I would talk with the administration until I developed a consensus so we could obtain a majority and then go to the American people and say listen, we need to reverse course here, but we want to do it as a unified country. I would never play politics with war.

  • Feingold was able to respond to that in the course of answering another question, about whether the U.S. was doing the right things to prevent another 9/11:

    The fact is the president is doing the best job he can but we are not focusing and have not been focusing since 9/11 on the real issue. The real issue is Al Qaeda is an international syndicate that operates in many countries. We should not be invading country after country and getting stuck there, when the real plan is to work with other nations — and almost every nation in the world wants to get these guys — to find them, and destroy them. That is absolutely essential and we have to have a global vision of this.

    And you’re not going to that global vision, Ron, by just talking privately to Congressmen. You’ve got to talk to other people, you’ve got to talk to experts, you’ve got to talk to constituents. The people of Wisconsin actually have something to offer you and me about their views about what we should do to protect our country.

Herewith a confession: I don’t agree with Senator Feingold about everything. For example, while I know my side has lost the argument by now, I don’t consider gun ownership to be an individual right, or they wouldn’t have put all that stuff about “well regulated militia” up front in the Second Amendment. I also disagree that “all options have to be on the table” to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

But I think Feingold is right a lot more often than he’s wrong. Feingold would of course never be a lockstep Republican the way Johnson surely would. But when I think about the PATRIOT Act, Iraq, TARP, Afghanistan, and FISA, to name a few, I like that Feingold’s no lockstep Democrat either.  Support Russ Feingold now!


Wow! $986 and counting for Feingold

October 8, 2010

By: Thomas Nephew

As I write this, we’ve raised $986 for Senator Russ Feingold’s re-election campaign — just $14 shy of our goal of $1000. Way to go, “Get FISA Right” supporters! Nearly two dozen of you have stepped up with generous donations — thank you all!  For those who haven’t — please support Russ Feingold now!

By adding different “refcode” tags to the different email appeals and blog links, we’re able to see where the donation clicks are happening. Of the 23 donations so far, about one third were done via the mass e-mailing to “MyBarackObama” lists, another third happened via links at this blog (either in the post or the ‘widget’ at the upper right corner), and the remainder have come from untagged links or other miscellaneous sources. The lesson seems to be that everything can work, but it may work best when it’s synergistic and simultaneous — it seemed to me that donation pace accelerated during the day yesterday, perhaps as multiple reminders showed up on people’s computer screens. …So get ready for another blitz.  Support Russ Feingold now!

Enough on fundraising minutiae — how’s the Wisconsin campaign going? Unfortunately, the most recent polls I could find (October 1) suggested the race was getting tougher for Feingold, with Johnson if anything widening his lead. At the Huffington Post, Mark Blumenthal writes: “The trend in Johnson’s favor since the summer is hard to miss. Our trend line estimate now puts Johnson ahead by nearly 10 points (52.9% to 43.1%).” On the other hand, the Feingold campaign has cited internal polling showing the race is virtually tied, and Feingold has gone on the air with an ad accusing Johnson’s team of ‘excessive celebration.’

Whatever the case may be, it’s important for us to not let dismay at poll numbers turn into inaction, and thereby turn those numbers into a self-fulfilling prophecy of defeat. Support Russ Feingold now! Let’s go ahead and do what needs to be done so Feingold can keep fighting the good fight in Wisconsin — while his opponent hides from view. The Wisconsin Journal-Sentinel’s Don Walker reports (October 7):

Turn on the television or listen to the radio, and Republican Ron Johnson is everywhere. Finding him on the campaign trail can be a little more difficult. […] Aside from carefully scripted campaign events, it is hard for the public to get information about his appearances before groups and organizations. “We don’t receive any advance notifications of his travels or appointments,” said Stewart Rieckman, general manager and executive editor of the Oshkosh Northwestern, Johnson’s hometown newspaper. The Associated Press says the same thing. The Wisconsin Newspaper Association also inquired about a campaign schedule for member newspapers, but the Johnson campaign has not responded, according to Beth Bennett, the group’s executive director. Last Sunday, the Northwestern published a profile about Johnson. Rieckman said Johnson did not respond to multiple requests for an interview for the story. “This is the strategy,” Rieckman said. “Shield him from the press. Keep him under the radar.”

Walker goes on to attribute that to the advent of online campaigning. Personally, I think “Citizens United” and a tidal wave of anonymously sourced advertising has more to do with it. Johnson doesn’t show himself because he doesn’t need to show himself. When he does, it even embarrasses some conservative spectators, as at a grassroots “vetting” event where Johnson was asked whether he supported the Patriot Act. Johnson’s response:

…I’ll put it this way: So much of the Patriot Act exists in law, and they just put it within that law. I certainly share the concerns of civil liberties. Now if you have Barack Obama in charge versus George Bush—I wasn’t overly concerned with George Bush in power. I’m a little more concerned about the Patriot Act when you have Barack Obama. […] Our nation was at risk. When you’re at risk by things like international terrorism and stuff, you have to react to that. And you sometimes have to give up a little bit. But again, I like the fact that it should be of a temporary nature and be something for renewal. …

“pompadour”‘s response shows that civil liberties concerns aren’t limited to the left:

Here’s a tip for you, Ron: A law that compromises civil liberties is problematic no matter who’s in power. […] That[Johnson]’s comfortable with the Patriot Act in one administration’s hands but not another—and that he’d keep it around anyway—demonstrates how far from the Constitution Johnson’s actually standing. He doesn’t grasp the very real danger that lies in passing and growing accustomed to any law that grants government unconstitutional powers over the People.

(Emphasis in original.) Couldn’t have said it better myself. Support Russ Feingold now!

[crossposted from newsrack blog]
=====
UPDATE, 1pm: $1002, from 24 donors!!! This is now one of the most successful fundraising drives for Russ Feingold on ActBlue — we’re currently in 9th place for total dollars raised and 11th for number of donors.  Thanks to everyone who has helped and to everyone who has donated!  Let’s run up the score for Russ Feingold!
2D UPDATE: I corresponded with Harry about this last night; we’re increasing our goal to $1500.


Fundraise for Feingold: Reward Patriotism over Politics

October 7, 2010

By: Harry Waisbren

Day 1 of our fundraising push for Feingold is over, with initial returns of 10 donations for a total of $371. This is  a modest sum, but in just a day we are over a third of the way to our $1,000 goal, and any donation is help that our constitution’s best ally in the Senate wouldn’t have otherwise had!

I just made a donation, and I must admit, I couldn’t be prouder to do so. I’m biased, though, because Sen. Feingold is my state’s Senator, and I happen to be a particularly proud Wisconsinite at that. Past mere state pride though, my close proximity to his leadership growing up really did have an impact on me. This was especially the case going to school at the University of Wisconsin Madison, where the power of his example runs deeply in the values of the city at large.

In fact, reading an old article I wrote about him for The Badger Herald reminded me just how much I was inspired by Feingold’s passion then…and how little has changed since. Then as now, Feingold: political rarity in today’s world.

As a progressive Wisconsinite, I often feel spoiled by the quality leadership emanating from U.S. Sen. Russ Feingold’s office. Mr. Feingold is that rare sort of politician, from any political party, who is truly willing to stand strong behind his principles no matter the political efficacy of the situation.

Ouch…Given Feingold’s current constraints, the intro to my article hits pretty close to home, quite literally for me in fact. This isn’t to say that he would be in a better situation politically if he would stand up any less resolutely for his principles, just that I still feel that spoiled to have this rare sort of politician as my Senator.

How many politicians can we reasonably say stand as firmly behind their principles, no matter the political efficacy of the situation, as Feingold does? I’d go so far to say that there aren’t any politicians today that have proven this as concretely as he has. When things get the darkest for the rule of law in contemporary America, he always seems to be the politician civil libertarians of all stripes end up thanking the most profusely, and this is a big part of why I so proudly call myself a #FeingoldDem.

So if you can, send a reward to Feingold for putting patriotism over politics. Even if you aren’t a Democrat, it will make you feel good to support a politician who actually does this, rather than merely talks about it. Isn’t that an example we wish every politician would follow—-and wouldn’t you feel proud to support this kind of politician when they need it most?


‘Get FISA Right’ fundraising push for Feingold underway

October 6, 2010

By: Thomas Nephew

If you haven’t checked your inbox yet, go have a look now — for an email titled “Russ Feingold needs our help *now*!”

Goal Thermometer
Fundraising drive status;
click through to donate!

We want to raise at least $1,000 for Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI).  Why?  As our email — announced here yesterday and developed jointly by Thomas Nephew, Harry Waisbren, and others — puts it:

As a supporter of getting FISA right again, and of repealing the PATRIOT Act, we probably don’t have to tell you Russ Feingold is our best ally in the Senate.   National security and human rights advocates have had to develop separate scenarios for the post-election period, depending on whether or not Russ is re-elected. One activist tells us “Even if Democrats hold the Senate, if Russ Feingold is not among them, the dynamic (and the White House, internalizing the message that “civil liberties don’t sell”) will tack demonstrably to the right.”

It’s absolutely critical we help Russ out as much as we can.

If you haven’t already — please give now!! Senator Feingold is facing well-financed opponent and — (no) thanks to Citizens United — a tidal wave of uncontrolled campaign advertising by other groups.  We need to have Russ’s back:

  • Russ Feingold was the only senator to vote against the PATRIOT Act, presciently warning, “I am also very troubled by the broad expansion of government power under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA. […] ….the government can apparently go on a fishing expedition and collect information on virtually anyone. All it has to allege in order to get an order for these records from the court is that the information is sought for an investigation of international terrorism or clandestine intelligence gathering. That’s it.”
  • Senator Feingold’s principled stand against the PATRIOT Act gained him allies in the effort to block the Military Commissions Act in 2006. Speaking in opposition, Feingold said : “Under this legislation, some individuals, at the designation of the executive branch alone, could be picked up, even in the United States, and held indefinitely without trial and without any access whatsoever to the courts. …why would we turn our back on hundreds of years of history and our nation’s commitment to liberty — particularly when there is no good reason to do so?”
  • Senator Feingold has worked with President Obama, but has called Obama to account when necessary. Feingold produced recommendations doubling as a scorecard for evaluating Obama’s performance on the rule of law in his first hundred days in office. The senator was among the first to criticize the Obama administration’s overuse of state secrets privileges — giving the Obama administration “Grade: D | Status: Troubling”
  • And of course, Senator Feingold was at the forefront in fighting against the FISA Amendment Act ratifying lawbreaking by the Bush administration, joining Senator Dodd in proposing an amendment to keep the telecom companies on the hook for assisting illegal surveillance. Feingold: “…even as the administration sought and obtained broad new authorities to collect communications of Americans, the administration refused to even consider when it might be violating the Constitution. If the administration can’t assure us that they respect the Constitution, Congress needs to step in.”

Again — please give what you can, even give a little more than you planned to.  And share this with your friends and followers on Facebook  and Twitter (hashtag #feingolddem); when you donate, there will be buttons for spreading the word.

Let’s rally for Russ!


Get FISA Right Update: October 5, 2010

October 5, 2010

By: Harry Waisbren

Hey everyone, checking in with three different Get FISA Right updates for you:

1. First, Sally instigated a great rehashing of how our group functions by making a suggestion for a petition for us to sign (more on that below) within an email thread, and asking how our group comes to decide on supporting initiatives.

I clarified to her that Get FISA Right is a crowdsourcing project, in which there isn’t a single leader/s from the top down dictating. Rather, if the group collectively decides on something, it can/should happen from the ground up! In practice, what this has meant is that individuals have taken the initiative on projects they care about and have ran with them, inspiring others to a consensus if it is to become something Get FISA Right at large is to support.

Now, there are certainly leaders specifically facilitating this kind of communication and processes, but it’s not our role necessarily to decide heavy handedly which petitions we sign and such. Furthermore, we always could use more people stepping up and taking a lead on facilitating the group coming to these decisions as well, so please let us know if you would like to help!

From there, Jon responded with some more details of our recent history of doing this in practice, which you will find summarized below in case anyone would like to suggest an issue later on that they would like to promote in this fashion (or if you are merely curious about how we work):

  • Start with a blog post introducing the issue to the group
  • Move on to a discussion thread a few days later, where we try to summarize the best pro and con arguments that were presented
  • Present a voting thread of some kind a day or two after that to come to a final decision

2. Secondly, the issue Sally brought up was whether or not our group should sign on to the International Action Center’s letter to Stop FBI Repression of Anti-War Activists NOW: Condemn the FBI Raids and Harassment of Anti-War and International Solidarity Activists!

Sally sent out an email about this last week, and this post will further do as our  blog post introducing it. Next step is to let us know—in either the comments of this post or in Sally’s email thread—what you think. After that, we’ll go through the pro and con arguments, and then we can vote.

3. Lastly, Thomas has taken the lead inspiring members of our group within different email threads to further come to Russ Feingold’s defenses. Mark had previously led our support for him with emails in advocating participation in the senator’s highly successful “Cheddar Bomb”, and Thomas is likewise leading another donation push (here’s the link to a wiki page he set up to craft the first email of this initiative),

Lot going on, and more to come!